Bitget Cheap vs Fast Network by Coin — Pay 20% Less
Open Bitget with code chaintool: 20% lower trading fees
chaintoolMost people just share a referral link. We give you 20% of our commission back as lower fees.
Five separate guides on this site each cover one asset’s fee-vs-speed split in depth. This one is the index: all five, side by side, so you can see which trade-off is steep and which is barely worth thinking about before clicking into the full breakdown.
| Asset | Cheapest | Fastest | Wait ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | BEP20 (0.00000029 BTC, 60 conf.) | BTC (0.00002 BTC, 3 conf.) | 20× |
| ETH | ArbitrumOne (0.000002 ETH, 12 conf.) | Starknet (0.00001 ETH, 10 conf.) | 1× |
| POL | Polygon (0.2 POL, 300 conf.) | ERC20 (22.14349 POL, 96 conf.) | 3× |
| ETC | ETC (0.008 ETC, 1,000 conf.) | BEP20 (0.019557 ETC, 60 conf.) | 17× |
| AVAX | AVAXC-Chain (0.0064 AVAX, 60 conf.) | AVAXX-Chain (0.008 AVAX, 3 conf.) | 20× |
How to read the “wait ratio” column
It’s the cheapest network’s confirmation count divided by the fastest network’s — how many times longer Bitget makes you wait if you pick the cheap option over the fast one. A higher number doesn’t automatically mean a worse deal; check the actual fee gap too. ETC’s ratio is one of the highest here, but the fee saved by waiting longer is tiny — see ETC’s full breakdown. AVAX’s ratio is similar, but so is its fee gap, which changes the calculus.
Full breakdowns
Each row links to its own guide with the complete network table, not just the two extremes shown here: