Bitget: Cheapest vs Priciest Network, Per Coin (2026)
Every guide on this site so far has looked at one coin’s cheapest and priciest network. This one puts them side by side, so the size of the gap is easy to compare across coins at once.
| Asset | Cheapest | Priciest | Priciest ÷ cheapest |
|---|---|---|---|
| USDT | 0.001 USDT (Plasma) | 1.5 USDT (TRC20) | 1500.0× |
| POL | 0.2 POL (Polygon) | 8.324662 POL (ERC20) | 41.6× |
| BTC | 0.000002 BTC (BEP20) | 0.00003 BTC (BTC) | 15.7× |
| ETH | 0.00003 ETH (Optimism) | 0.0002 ETH (ETH) | 6.7× |
| SHIB | 27,711.065952 SHIB (BEP20) | 147,792.351746 SHIB (ERC20) | 5.3× |
| ETC | 0.008 ETC (ETC) | 0.017241 ETC (BEP20) | 2.2× |
| AVAX | 0.0064 AVAX (AVAXC-Chain) | 0.008 AVAX (AVAXX-Chain) | 1.3× |
| USDC | 0 USDC (BEP20) | 1 USDC (SEIEVM) | — |
Read the ratio, not just the fee
A small absolute fee can still be a bad deal in relative terms. The ratio column is what matters here: it’s how many times more the priciest network costs than the cheapest one, for the exact same coin. A coin with a huge ratio isn’t inherently more expensive — it just punishes the wrong choice harder.
USDC doesn’t get a ratio at all in this table, because its cheapest networks currently charge nothing — dividing by zero doesn’t produce a meaningful multiple, so it’s shown as “—” instead of a made-up number.
The one habit this justifies
Before withdrawing any coin that shows up high on this list, spend the extra ten seconds checking which network you’ve selected. On the coins at the top of this table, that habit is worth more than almost any other fee-saving trick on this site.